Reviewing Jose annotated bib 

1. jose shows a clear question and thesis stament that works well and i see no reason for him to change it.

2. the question and thesis tie the sources perfectly together and can be concevied cohesively.

source/ annotations.

1. he will have to make some effort in citing the articals in mla format.

2. yes,  he added the reason and the evalutation of the topic.

3. i think jose did really well in explaining the main points of the artical.

4. yes, he adherse to the 100 -150 word count.

bibliography

1. yes he has at least 2 peer reviwe.

2. the bib is cohesive and goes together nicely.

4. Engage in the collaborative and social aspects of writing processes.

5. Understand and use print and digital technologies to address a range of audiences.

6. Locate research sources (including academic journal articles, magazine and newspaper articles) in the library’s databases or archives and on the Internet and evaluate them for credibility, accuracy, timeliness, and bias.

first, I will talk about number 4. for the first time I participated in the Collab’s in class and understood the things my essay misses as well as the MLA format that I needed to add in my writing. the group collab’s also helped me in seeing how other classmates decided to write their essay’s. as for the next point I think that I had trouble in choosing an audience but if I had to choose one it would be the people of the stem field since they are the one’s I’m talk about a lot within the essay. but my essay is also for those with the hope of there being renown recognition for the paranormal in the scientific field. for the last point I had trouble with finding sources with different evidence, so I had to improvise with my word choice and the quote I would use. but I think everything held up from my credibility to my biases.